From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 12:03:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FCA496 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (nibbler.fubar.geek.nz [199.48.134.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A9D856 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.lan (97e078e7.skybroadband.com [151.224.120.231]) by nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B672273000; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:15 +0000 From: Andrew Turner To: Svatopluk Kraus Subject: Re: interrupt framework Message-ID: <20150116120315.7f343f66@bender.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20150115192624.122066dd@bender.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:26 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:44:22 +0100 Svatopluk Kraus wrote: ... > It's just a few things from quick look now which are different in our > design. However, my intention is not read our code on behalf of you. I > still think that our design is more general mainly and can serve for > interrupt controllers better. I was asking on the differences as I'm already in the process of importing the arm_intrng project branch as I need something like it on arm64. It is also based on the same code from Jakub and Ian, I haven't looked at changing the design, just cleaning up the code to import into head. I would be happy to merge your code instead, along with my existing cleanups, however I would need to know why I should spend time on it as opposed to the current development branch. If we do decide to with your change I would like to import it into the arm_intrng project branch first to assist the import into head. Andrew