Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:03:15 +0000 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interrupt framework Message-ID: <20150116120315.7f343f66@bender.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAFHCsPW5q=jMsehuYro7V5g56pMXK1tENP-_ibpg0q76LLWxJQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFHCsPX5kG_v-F-cjpyMQsT_b386eok=mqWW0%2BEUb_4-_1Otnw@mail.gmail.com> <20150115192624.122066dd@bender.lan> <CAFHCsPW5q=jMsehuYro7V5g56pMXK1tENP-_ibpg0q76LLWxJQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:44:22 +0100 Svatopluk Kraus <onwahe@gmail.com> wrote: ... > It's just a few things from quick look now which are different in our > design. However, my intention is not read our code on behalf of you. I > still think that our design is more general mainly and can serve for > interrupt controllers better. I was asking on the differences as I'm already in the process of importing the arm_intrng project branch as I need something like it on arm64. It is also based on the same code from Jakub and Ian, I haven't looked at changing the design, just cleaning up the code to import into head. I would be happy to merge your code instead, along with my existing cleanups, however I would need to know why I should spend time on it as opposed to the current development branch. If we do decide to with your change I would like to import it into the arm_intrng project branch first to assist the import into head. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150116120315.7f343f66>