From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Sep 20 09:15:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D3C1095FEF; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp01.mail.online.nl (smtp01.mail.online.nl [194.134.25.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD01C83E6E; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from slimpie.localnet (s55969a9e.adsl.online.nl [85.150.154.158]) by smtp01.mail.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0A9400AE; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:15:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: Jan Beich Cc: Brooks Davis , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r480151 - head/devel/llvm70 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:14:27 -0400 Message-ID: <2793602.gZosO0jhVC@slimpie> Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <7ejg-7ruq-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201809200247.w8K2lO74078886@repo.freebsd.org> <7ejg-7ruq-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9863745.JZN12C9dl5"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:15:55 -0000 --nextPart9863745.JZN12C9dl5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" (Snipping just a part of the diff Jan proposes) On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:47:09 PM EDT Jan Beich wrote: > # License are listed in the order they appear in LICENSE.TXT > -LICENSE= LLVM GTEST REGEX MIT ARM PD > +LICENSE= ARM BSD3CLAUSE MIT NCSA PD REGEX Now the comment lies. It'd probably be best to list them alphabetically, as per canon, and have the comment state what order they appear in the file (possibly also under what names). This is independent of the changes in naming (labeling) of the licenses. I'm most interested in handling the BSD3CLAUSE case, since that's roughly the same text, with the same intent in the three clauses, but obviously *different* text (the actual copyright notice "above", the names that appear in clause 3). Who makes the call "this license is intentionally the same as "? (port maintainer, obviously, but with what guidelines?) [ade] --nextPart9863745.JZN12C9dl5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABEIAB0WIQTVFBoRsP760fy+Jisy7lRaPghTTwUCW6Nk8wAKCRAy7lRaPghT T+2yAP9rc7p0Sl7l46zgDvqWh1dJssGgnkA0aaotsVSMRaBwkQD/YvLS0WFAN3En CxXjasZRy6qr61Lrqqpf5qjzi/E2tW4= =L4HU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9863745.JZN12C9dl5--