From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 13 23:37:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA19D16A418 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PH=69e892a4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74413C442 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PH=69e892a4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BBCD05B4 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:37:43 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071014003743.38adc0d0@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071013035725.GA14352@shaftoe.nepharia.org> References: <20071013035725.GA14352@shaftoe.nepharia.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PPPoE dialer CPU usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:37:47 -0000 On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:25 -0500 Dave Curry wrote: > Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing > excessive CPU usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've been running > into is since the 5th, the message "Unexpected packet code 9" has > been showing up every 10 seconds in syslog, the CPU usage is maxed, I > seem to be getting pinged by my PPPoE gateway every 10 seconds, and I > can't seem to find out what the cause of this is. Have checked other > net traffic to no avail, tried compiling the dialer with debugging > options which did nothing, and any sort of insight that could be > offered at this point is dearly welcome. Is there any particular reason for using the roaring-penguin version? ppp in the base-system works fine for me, and it uses next to no cpu time.