From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Aug 6 15:33:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (host68.207.55.120.aadsl.com [207.55.120.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC75437B401 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@aa.net) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f76MZsH45932; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 15:35:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@aa.net) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jojo set sender to swear@aa.net using -f To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Should PRs be submitted ASAP or after researching fix? From: swear@aa.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: 06 Aug 2001 15:35:53 -0700 Message-ID: <743d74zuie.d74@localhost.localdomain> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've got a backlog of my own private "PRs", mostly against man pages and some which some would consider enhancements rather than bugs. I'll, of course, try to avoid submitting PRs injudiciously, but generally considered, should I 1) go ahead and file PRs now and then later (real soon, now :-) investigate fixes for the one's nobody's beaten me to, or 2) ask for some to be assigned to me, or 3) sit on them until I get around to investigating fixes/improvements to be submitted with the PR? Do ya'll really hate to get PRs that are 1) nit-picky (mispells, bad grammer bad punctuation) [sic]; 2) broad ("it's confusing"); 3) want perfection ("it should say how to do ")? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message