From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 16:39:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CA416A468 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B53B13C448 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so741361wxd for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.117.1 with SMTP id p1mr4683557wxc.1181320751946; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h35sm3235959wxd.2007.06.08.09.39.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:39:33 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20070608152559.GA69561@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20070608055839.7E3E.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> <20070608152559.GA69561@just.puresimplicity.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070608123258.358F.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re[2]: portupgrade -o oddness... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:39:12 -0000 On June 08, 2007 at 11:25AM Josh Tolbert wrote: > Filing a PR would be the obvious thing to do now that I know there's actually > a problem, isn't it? Seems like you enjoy stating the obvious, though. Actually, no. I think you would be amazed at the number of individuals who discover a problem, confirm it with other users and then just sit back and complain hoping that someone else will do something about. I meant no offense to you personally; it is just a fact of human nature. I wonder though whether anyone has actually filed a report on it yet. Since I don't use 'portupgrade' usually, I was not even aware of this problem. -- Gerard For AOL (L)Users: "RAM Disk" is not an installation procedure.