Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 07:58:20 PDT From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com> To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com> Cc: Mats Lofkvist <mal@algonet.se>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD dx4-100 - Any good? Message-ID: <9509061458.AA21913@gnu.mc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Sep 1995 17:14:01 PDT." <Pine.AUX.3.91.950905171215.5030A-100000@covina.lightside.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
while we're on the topic of cache, Are there are good performance studies of the effect of L2 cache on 486/DX4100 /DX2-66/DX2-50 I've never been exposed to a good discussion of cache...one system I have has what looks like a socket for cache (i.e. something like simms shaped differently), another system uses actual chips... I have some sram chips, and had a bear of a time plugging them in... (I didn't)... Should I insert the chips into carriers? About a decade ago, when I was doing hardware, it made life much, much easier... marty leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com Member of the League for Programming Freedom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9509061458.AA21913>