From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 1:33:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC8151E5 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 01:33:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from localhost (dfr@localhost) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA47143; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:32:51 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 09:32:51 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Warner Losh , Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc In-Reply-To: <20655.920182749@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, > > selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from > > this. > > Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why? I have found egcs to be slightly better at C++ code (for my own projects anyway). I believe that it may produce better code too but I don't have any real evidence. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message