From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 22 21:13:35 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDC616A401
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:13:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD4643D49
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:13:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE812083;
	Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D462E2082;
	Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B06B233C31; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com>
References: <200604221603.k3MG3rmI003382@mist.nodomain>
	<444A64A3.2020208@hotlz.com> <86zmido6m7.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<444A7F6A.4050206@hotlz.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <444A7F6A.4050206@hotlz.com> (Don Dugger's message of "Sat, 22
	Apr 2006 12:09:30 -0700")
Message-ID: <86irp1nwjq.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:13:35 -0000

Don Dugger <dugger@hotlz.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > // comments are neither better nor worse than /* */ comments, and
> > they have been available in C for seven years now.
> That's pure opinion and one that I haven't head.

The availability of // comments in C99, which is now seven years old,
is fact, not opinion.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no