From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 13 01:01:50 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2476289;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 01:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A004B949;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 01:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1D10TGV046986;
 Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:00:29 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com)
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org>
References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net>
 <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>,
 <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org>
From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:00:29 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-id: <88e1e09e1f329b88da8f2fa5bde6005e@ultimatedns.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 01:01:50 -0000

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:47:27 -0700 Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote

> On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for
> > > tha= > t I
> > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the
> > > old = .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > make
> > > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10.
> > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Bapt
> > > 
> > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to
> > > remove old make without notice ?
> > > 
> > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and
> > that is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Bapt
> 
> fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it?  That's what I vaguely remember
> as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake
> source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but
> available as a port.
If that's the case. It all hardly seems worth an announcement.
Nothing's lost, and everyone wins. :)

--Chris
> 
> -- Ian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"