Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:54:50 -0800 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Toomas Aas <toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee> Cc: craig@2400baud.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IMAP Authentication Message-ID: <20021228135450.GF215@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <200212281028.gBSAShV14011@lv.raad.tartu.ee> References: <1041021967.3e0cbc0fc9bcf@webmail.2400baud.com> <200212281028.gBSAShV14011@lv.raad.tartu.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (12.28.2002 @ 0227 PST): Toomas Aas said, in 0.7K: << > > In addition, does anyone have a preference on the use of a pop3/imap > > setup for a mail server? > > It is my understanding that UW-IMAP is not the best possible IMAP > server out there. I've read about lots of security problems with it in > the past. I absolutely, positively, could not get imap-uw to work with mutt, no matter what I tried. So I gave up, and went with courier-imapd. > Regarding my preference - Cyrus IMAPD has always worked well for my > webmail server (not using Squirrelmail, though). I use courier-imapd with SquirrelMail, and it rocks. It doesn't knock my socks off when it's using really large directories, though. I save every porn spam I get (dunno why... I get about 50/day), and it takes my server about a good 5 minutes to parse the directory each time I open the folder in mutt. Or squirrelmail. # Adam - -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx FreeBSD.org << adamw@FreeBSD.ORG Bayer Berkeley >> adam.weinberger.b@bayer.com #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Da0qo8KM2ULHQ/0RAq7qAKDPvpKW7ERHzFY1fRo7Rp7MCwxjcQCgr9VL W2J6OHW9xgQyOfWFmgPqJJg= =CaB9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021228135450.GF215>