From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov 23 17:40:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8669116A4CE
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from papagena.rockefeller.edu (user-0cdfenm.cable.mindspring.com
	[24.215.186.246])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EE6443FD7
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:40:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rsidd@online.fr)
Received: (qmail 8242 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Nov 2003 01:40:45 -0000
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:40:45 -0500
From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
To: Duncan Barclay <dmlb@dmlb.org>
Message-ID: <20031124014045.GA8152@online.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <017701c3b21f$f39bf340$43c8a8c0@orac>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:40:48 -0000

<3FBC2053.6040208@mindspring.com><20031120022009.GB29530@dan.emsphone.com>
<3FBC29EF.3030009@mindspring.com><3FBC50DB.3000002@acm.org>
<20031123225117.GA24696@dragon.nuxi.com><017701c3b21f$f39bf340$43c8a8c0@orac>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20 i686

Duncan Barclay wrote:
> From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
>  
> > I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above.  I don't know of a
> > SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when
> > multi-user.  Not ONE.  Every Bourne shell'ish user I've ever met
> > uses
> > Bash, AT&T ksh, pdksh, zsh.
> 
> I don't know anyone that farms lama's, so there cannot be any lama
> farmers.

I very much doubt there are any.  

"The one-l lama is a priest
 The two-l llama is a beast
 And I will bet a silk pajama
 You'll never see a three-l lllama" 
                       -- Ogden Nash.

- Rahul