From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 26 16:54:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from repulse.lovett.com (repulse.lovett.com [38.155.241.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77B6150A7 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 16:54:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by repulse.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.01 #1) id 10mnUt-0000BH-00; Wed, 26 May 1999 18:54:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 18:54:07 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: Chris Piazza Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnupg 0.9.7 Message-ID: <19990526185407.D490@lovett.com> References: <199905262311.QAA28551@shell13.ba.best.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Chris Piazza on Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:35:07PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:35:07PM -0700, Chris Piazza wrote: > > Yeah we've seen this before (there's still a PR open on this...). I think a > "hack" would be to apply the patchbelow. I'm not sure if gnupg's ASM stuff is > truly broken for older gcc's or if it's a local problem. It appears to be an older-gcc problem, unless you count taking a completely empty machine, installing 3.2-RELEASE on it, and then trying to make the gnupg port as the first thing after the initial reboot, a local problem. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message