From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 10 07:55:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8D516A4CE; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 07:55:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9A7trtd004975; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 03:55:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9A7tp4v004974; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 03:55:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 03:55:50 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: "Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra" Message-ID: <20041010075550.GC925@green.homeunix.org> References: <416737B8.8090800@error404.nls.net> <4167A69F.6070505@error404.nls.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4167A69F.6070505@error404.nls.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LOR g_xdown vs user map X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 07:55:54 -0000 On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:51:43AM -0400, Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra wrote: > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > ><>On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Ketrien I. Saihr-Kesenchedra wrote: > > > >Hi, > >thanks for reporting. I have added it with LOR ID 041: > >http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#041 > > > >I am Cc:ing current@ to let the others know about it > > > Yeah, I'm lazy, so I didn't do that. ;) > There are other issues with amr(4) on the system currently, and scottl > is working on them AFAIK. This one is new as of today. System producing > it is a 4-way Opteron 848 with 8GB, running -CUR sources from about > 1800 EDT Friday, with Brian Feldman's uma patch applied additionally. > ADAPTIVE_GIANT was enabled at the time, additionally. (Yes, you can > shoot me for forgetting that,) but I've been unable to reproduce reliably. > And what the heck is triggering alltraps_with_regs_pushed()? I've never > seen that before on any systems. Is it okay that amr(4) calls bus_dmamap_load(), doesn't check the return value, then immediately calls bus_dmamap_sync() -- when the tags in use were not allocated with BUS_DMAMEM_ALLOCNOW? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\