From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 19 19:39:58 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AC81065673
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378D78FC13
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LOzyT-00079Y-AG
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:54 +0000
Received: from 193.33.173.33 ([193.33.173.33])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:53 +0000
Received: from c.kworr by 193.33.173.33 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:53 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:39:41 +0200
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <gl2ktt$1ao$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org>
	<20090119081843.GA49607@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.33.173.33
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090113 SeaMonkey/1.1.14
In-Reply-To: <20090119081843.GA49607@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: NTFS in GENERIC: opt-in or opt-out?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:39:58 -0000

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and 
>> noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS 
>> module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The 
>> question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt 
>> out) in GENERIC? What do people think?
> 
> given that the sysutils/fusefs-ntfs seems to be much better,
> I'd rather remove the in-kernel ntfs from both and replace
> with a note on what to do to use fusefs-ntfs

That's not. fuse-ntfs can't work with 4G files.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.