From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 22:03:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE57A98 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from mail.uugrn.org (mail.uugrn.org [IPv6:2a03:2500:1:6:b::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3739F2 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rabe.uugrn.org (rabe.uugrn.org [IPv6:2a03:2500:1:6:19::]) by mail.uugrn.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1IM38gM017424; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from rabox.fritz.box (rabe@rabe.uugrn.org [164.177.171.25]) by rabe.uugrn.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1IM38UN017420; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@uugrn.org) Received: from rabox.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rabox.fritz.box (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id r1IM38m3004696; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:08 +0100 Received: (from rabe@localhost) by rabox.fritz.box (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r1IM38s3004695; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:08 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: rabox.fritz.box: rabe set sender to rabe@uugrn.org using -f Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:03:08 +0100 From: Raphael Eiselstein To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Using just db44 for all instead of mixed usage of db41/db42/db44 (was: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?) Message-ID: <20130218220307.GA4315@ma.sigsys.de> References: <20130208201503.GB4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130208220108.GC4018@ma.sigsys.de> <86ehgpabwi.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> <20130209131330.GF4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130215230004.GB4056@ma.sigsys.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Raphael Eiselstein X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:03:21 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:14:28PM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > The reason that there are so many BDB versions in ports is that > several of the functions had additional arguments added or swapped > between versions. What will happen if one binary is linked against db41 *and* db44 through other libraries? ldd showed db41 and db44 for the mutt binary, what will happen when calling one of these "unstable" functions?=20 What is the difference between linking against db41 *plus* db44 or linking just to db44 for all binaries? Conflicts? Overloading? Segfaults? How may I (automatically) check for incompatible db4x-Version? compiler/linker errors? Runtime errors? Data structure errors in data files? Data loss or corrupted db files? Regards Raphael --=20 Raphael Eiselstein http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freibyter@gmx.de | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein = =20 GnuPG: E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828 6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D =2E........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.. --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEipRsACgkQnNo+exDKny1UPgCfWlne7+uh40UQhcE/rJNLx0wo MCMAnAyDtukFgU4L+Kn3HAEOUWzM4fy3 =1v1p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--