From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 22 20:41:17 2011
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173EE1065670;
	Sun, 22 May 2011 20:41:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49E8151136;
	Sun, 22 May 2011 20:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4DD974E9.8040000@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 13:41:13 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
References: <201105221632.p4MGWjUb081825@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20110522202256.GA43412@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110522202256.GA43412@freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,
	src-committers@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r222183 - head/lib/clang
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 20:41:17 -0000

On 05/22/2011 13:22, Roman Divacky wrote:
> The problem here is deeper in my opinion. What FreeBSD calls
> amd64 the rest of the world (ie. linux) calls x86_64, I think
> that instead of this we should teach llvm/clang about "amd64".
> Maybe as a FreeBSD-only diff.

Can we please not go down that route with clang? It was a mistake to add 
a bunch of FreeBSD'isms to gcc because it made it that much harder for 
both the code and the compiler to be modular. We have a chance to atone 
for these mistakes while introducing a new compiler, can we please not 
make them again?


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/