From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 5 12:28:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAC9FE5; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A21DDE6; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YTUtJ-000O6N-ON; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:28:37 +0300 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:28:37 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: svn commit: r279603 - in head: bin/rcp usr.bin/rlogin usr.bin/rsh Message-ID: <20150305122837.GN48476@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201503042201.t24M1jDG009278@svn.freebsd.org> <20150305114828.GK17947@FreeBSD.org> <20150305122103.GA90978@zxy.spb.ru> <0969203E-A391-4528-8CA3-ABF96D5E5ED6@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0969203E-A391-4528-8CA3-ABF96D5E5ED6@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:28:41 -0000 On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:24:05PM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: > On 5 Mar 2015, at 12:21, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > >> I guess when they are going to be not precious enough to be removed? :) > >> > >> In modern world of ssh and https, does any OS require them in base? > > > > yes. > > Some telecom equipment require rlogin. > > 'Some relatively obscure use case needs them' is not usually the > requirement for keeping something in the base system. Presumably > people who interact with telecoms equipment are capable of > installing packages... And install from package ssh, inetd, systemd, binutils...