From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 19:58:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0583916A4CF for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:58:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578E643D58 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:58:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9EJw0Zi054784; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:58:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <416EDA36.1070403@DeepCore.dk> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:57:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <20041014105927.GU718@empiric.icir.org> <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:58:06 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: >=20 >> On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >>> [ ...well made userland point snipped... ] >>> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented right = >>> now, >>> this is unlikely to happen soon. >> >> >> Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to=20 >> happen ever since atapicam entered the tree. >=20 >=20 > I'd strongly agree, unless there is a major downside to doing so. >=20 > (Disclaimer: Having ATAPICAM in GENERIC would reduce my email support=20 > burden for the dvd+rw-tools port by a noticable fraction. :-) But will do the opposite to my mailbox, and I *dont* support atapicam,=20 so I think its a bad idea, besides I waste enough time as is, thanks... --=20 -S=F8ren