Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:57:42 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <416EDA36.1070403@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <20041014105927.GU718@empiric.icir.org> <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Swiger wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: >=20 >> On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >>> [ ...well made userland point snipped... ] >>> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented right = >>> now, >>> this is unlikely to happen soon. >> >> >> Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to=20 >> happen ever since atapicam entered the tree. >=20 >=20 > I'd strongly agree, unless there is a major downside to doing so. >=20 > (Disclaimer: Having ATAPICAM in GENERIC would reduce my email support=20 > burden for the dvd+rw-tools port by a noticable fraction. :-) But will do the opposite to my mailbox, and I *dont* support atapicam,=20 so I think its a bad idea, besides I waste enough time as is, thanks... --=20 -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?416EDA36.1070403>