From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 15:01:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC019106566B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453CC8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so554364wey.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dX5Y0Bod445VfU7eorUGAJprICtpEeQ7btRwVonJYh8=; b=fjDTV1Fk1gfofsz8rCFllYX8n1fkUJQARj2bwqasOgGZuUxsEHCD2hkY1qD+TfvFCs tp0l0cb+gEvRPy6Opcqz1ZqWs52Yf0ux/n4uTI1GztDsSESVyLLeocU/JF9T62pFoWc8 8KABRXjb5Ac55KMIxkHHgSMK9w8vqaQxcuq4CJRg7caeP3hEaGqSeqy5W8WzQTWyGWbx +Yrw6TAFVJDqOJiJQrr+OkMoWrrSPzZgWtkNy60qkbB4rSwCu450vpb4nUkGzv3aN9Fr v1DMb2c8eQ+UOETKRAmnhWOtsO67j7w/I0HCW8jiUQrEL4/aw363dILxdjKlWbNBh0sR TENQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.97.106 with SMTP id dz10mr4307095wib.21.1346252510415; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.160.9 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1865271844.20120829131610@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:01:50 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm0+F0tsgL1XkDJOoyaghqhsjolAPw6PEWTkVNbfUmngTkF0qaE0eTaw9ZtM1U9eeQW83D0 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw, "ip|all" proto and PPPoE -- does PPPoE packets passed to ipfw? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:51 -0000 On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > ip from any to any in recv vr0 "any" here is also not appropriate...