From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 29 07:04:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA20550 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 07:04:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA20499 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 07:03:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA05708; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:03:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:03:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: Greg Lehey cc: Jason Godsey , The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ldconfig: WARNING! '/usr/lib' can not be used In-Reply-To: <19980629104133.D897@freebie.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Greg Lehey wrote: > I still think this is tacky. I can understand the background, but > there should be another way to do this. What's the long-term goal? > /usr/lib/aout and /usr/lib/elf? Even then, I can't see any reason to > exclude directories from the ldconfig search. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you, this is just a hack in the service of moving from a.out to ELF, and will not be in 3.0-RELEASE, if I understand correctly. Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message