From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 21:04:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DA116A41F; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AB443D46; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8BL2IfJ087526; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:02:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43249B4F.3050907@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:02:07 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050823 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vizion References: <200509090959.40296.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <200509091848.53844.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <4323EA55.2030708@FreeBSD.org> <200509110750.15613.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200509110750.15613.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php extensions compile error - another compile bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:04:14 -0000 Vizion wrote: >Seeing as I am in the process of trying to build a resource to help victims of >the Katrina disaster your tone of correspondence, and speed of engagement, >has the unfortunate effect of reminding me about FEMA. > >There are two bugs in the makefile and one other issue that causes problems, >so it is not surprising that some degree of traffic was generated. > > > The first statement appears to be an attempt to rationalize your flurry of recent posts on a relatively trival subject, which at the last instance seems to be pretty much solved. The second is opinon at the very least and quite possibly pure tripe. The ports system works fine for me, on at least 4 different machines, as I noted in an email to you, personally, early on the morning of the 10th. I doubt seriously that I am alone in that. I furthermore wonder how one can decide that a couple of issues with oudated libraries constitutes a critical bug, and therefore requires that the port maintainer be cc'ed for every post you make to the list for the next two days. It was not difficult at all to find the issues with libmagic discussed in several threads by utilizing Google. WDDX accounts for a miniscule amount of PHP's functionality. The changes to the way the PHP port works were made *last summer*, and discussed in /usr/ports/UPDATING, which you are supposed to read when you install new or update previously installed ports. Do yourself a favor: update your system, read UPDATING, use Google, and chill?? ;-) Alex, I apologize for mentioning "the fine work you do" in a post in this thread. It was not my intention to tape "Hit Me" to your backside.... Kevin Kinsey