From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 16 03:02:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB2516A4CE for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:02:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66B743D48 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 625CD1C000A5 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4438F1C000A4 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:01:58 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050416030158279.4438F1C000A4@mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:01:57 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <639710293.20050416050157@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42607B44.4020406@gmail.com> References: <20050414071958.23388.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> <2b5f066d050414055716d3a12a@mail.gmail.com> <425E7195.7070901@gmail.com> <200504160112.05071.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <849508538.20050416025228@wanadoo.fr> <42607B44.4020406@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: India had no FreeBSD mirror sites ?!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 03:02:00 -0000 Subhro writes: > You got it wrong. *I* being old hands at FreeBSD, don't require their > help. But if I install FBSD on my little sisters PC, she would be > requiring some help. If I am around, thats not a problem. But if I am > not, the first place she would go to is the ISP, which i very much > expected. But unfortunately they are completely clueless. One cannot expect ISPs to know about every operating system available. It's hard enough just to support Windows, the most popular desktop OS around. Some companies might have the resources to support Macs, but not many. Hardly anyone can afford to support anything else. On the other hand, if ISPs didn't try so hard to hide the interfaces with their service and didn't try to "personalize" the connections so much, anyone would be able to connect to any ISP with any OS. But ISPs seem loath to admit that their basic services are highly interchangeable, and so they create an unnecessary support load for themselves by trying to be an exception to every rule. -- Anthony