From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 11:13:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6EB106566B for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jilingshu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9BC8FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so623842pwj.13 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:13:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:references :subject:message-id:organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ifkEWDU4MiMCCOzghTBMUb71Ni7Eg62E0s31Y+4EA+0=; b=gRwpkhe5vtOm4pZ8mTEBmioLRB4iBDDDHzE+ykwlNFk7pht25aUDvh8gYZRmG/D6jU WJIBypTFcWgpjB/JZoOhdY74twp1qu1dyHAHqvy/yztZ8MG/S8JErLfDPOq7MEtNgwcw SXUeooQLXE9/3zgWIipttzYWohpAyoFYdCggY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:references:subject:message-id:organization:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AAv3BaXY5dIZOg/ZQdhL72BH5njG+CiF+BvoAt5D3Wjf872sYK6zP0UodzvvcOodFR ou8uQTPfwIcz+VxlMtuorSmVpl83pdm2oaa2/SCNfpZRl4UU4CaPS/idj4zWflMt0BCs HrQdT4WAQzbXfPeWMNORtmuUMnDEvCzei+1MY= Received: by 10.142.207.9 with SMTP id e9mr720204wfg.331.1278069188799; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Bear-PC ([183.32.199.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g37sm623600rvb.17.2010.07.02.04.13.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 19:13:05 +0800 From: Bear To: "Kevin Oberman" , "Chris Stankevitz" References: <20100702045952.9561B1CC0D@ptavv.es.net> Message-ID: <201007021913031811054@Gmail.com> Organization: Freebear Develop Group X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome Subject: Re: Re: Is there something wrong with the default dbus policy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:13:20 -0000 hi, I have done this serval times. Yes, I installed serval times FreeBSD. Some of them is via package and others are via ports. They all the same. ------------------ Bear 2010-07-02 ------------------------------------------------------------- From:Kevin Oberman Send Date:2010-07-02 13:00:18 To:Chris Stankevitz CC:freebsd-gnome; Bear Subject:Re: Is there something wrong with the default dbus policy? > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:24:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Stankevitz > Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Bear wrote: > > In my system,no crash. Only the dbus policy deny the > > message of the gnome-session or maybe more processes. > > Is there any solutions? thx! > > The problem is completely repeatable with the steps I posted earlier. I reinstalled FreeBSD again, but this time I am installing everything using ports, not packages. This post leads me to believe my new strategy has a chance: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html > > I will report back. Sorry to have to say that of my systems had all ports re-installed after the latest gnome release and all from ports. No packages. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751