From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 04:33:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B323116A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.destefano@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3420343D45 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.destefano@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so479039wxc for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:33:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dqk5dBPcO7LwIsbp6uBLujM77biE4kogREbizPkClU7HBhWDt9J+y/85ORkKSR5fnDsYWgf1s2e1k3eXGdo5K+fGlVR7Khu5IEQ4RpBBbB0QMW6YJf4cqBu9prMof5B+KQNvlcdHIR/nModBU96upkPRKU037k5YE7dw7Ebdcas= Received: by 10.65.114.1 with SMTP id r1mr547403qbm; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.154.4 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:51:50 -0400 From: John DeStefano To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200510281922.16495.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6FB767AE-D4D7-4C38-90C0-726D48AF5654@secure-computing.net> <200510281922.16495.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Eric F Crist , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:33:43 -0000 On 10/28/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Friday 28 October 2005 17:31, John DeStefano wrote: > > On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist wrote: > > > > status report finished > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > =3D=3D > > > > percentDone-=3D>0 =3D 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=3D>1 / > > > > TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=3D>1 ) ) > > > > upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during > > > > (2) make > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > > > > -- > > > > update of ports collection complete with either some errors, ignore= d > > > > ports or both > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, this is the most crucial of all, and ironically the = one > > > > about which I've been asking since the beginning. As I mentioned > > > > earlier, upgrading this port bails consistently with a C callout to > > > > PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK. I'd really like to get this port updated, not > > > > only to finally complete this insane goose chase of updating, but > > > > because I know that apache-2.0.48 is chock full of vulerabilities. > > > > > > cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 && make deinstall && make clean && make > > > reinstall > > > > > > See what happens. > > > > Talk about strange: > > > > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/ > > # make deinstall > > =3D=3D=3D> Deinstalling for www/apache20 > > =3D=3D=3D> apache not installed, skipping > > > > # make -V PKGNAME > > apache-2.0.55 > > > > # pkg_info | grep apache > > apache-2.0.48 Version 2 of the extremely popular Apache http serv= er > > > > # apachectl -v > > Server version: Apache/2.0.48 > > Server built: Nov 19 2003 22:44:21 > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Try > ls /var/db/pkg/a* > any apache versions in there? > > -Mike Yep: it was 2.0.48 I ended up deinstalling that apache installation (which I was not keen on doing), and installing the apache20 port (which was the same version (2.0.55) as the apache2 port ), and, thankfully, it's working fine. I'm also now able to run both 'pkgdb -F'and 'portsdb -Uu' without ANY errors (except for a few 'Duplicate INDEX entry' warnings). Needless to say, this process wasn't much fun. What can I do to keep this from happening again? What can/can't I safely include in cron to automate database and index maintenance? Thanks to all.