From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 23 21:29:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA28850 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 21:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA28806 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 1996 21:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmith@localhost by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id NAA28568 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 13:59:25 +0930 From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199609240429.NAA28568@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Linux ELF crossdev on -current? To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 13:59:24 +0930 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ok all you lurking multiplatformers, I have a pretty straightforward question for you. 8) Fairly soon, one of the pieces of software that we use is going to be moving to using FLEXlm (it's a linux binary, but that's neither here nor there). In anticipation of this, I've contacted Globetrotter and am in posession of the current FLEXlm evaluation kit. What has me stumped just now is that to test the demo I have to build a vendor daemon (ignore the jargon); ie. I need to build a Linux ELF binary. Is anyone else doing this under 2.1.x or 2.2? Care to share a few words of wisdom? Globetrotter have been very helpful so far, and IMHO it would be a Good Thing for FLEX to work properly under FreeBSD. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[