From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 26 18:06:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F4816A4CE; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4901B43D60; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3R16QMd026089; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i3R16PuT071463; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i3R16PGR071462; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 18:06:25 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Ade Lovett Message-ID: <20040427010625.GB71345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200404262312.i3QNCGUp041625@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040427003254.GA71345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <8C376845-97E5-11D8-B4C2-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8C376845-97E5-11D8-B4C2-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake14 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:06:26 -0000 On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 05:55:16PM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote: > > Oh well. The email was basically along the lines of "the conversion > from pre-install to pre-su-install should probably be done as a tree > sweep, rather than just individual ports, run through a 4-exp build > before committing." Makes sense. I typically notify the maintainer if I run into it, under the assumption that the maintainer is unaware. I'm not looking for it. I expect that a sweep is a relatively big effort, but it'll be good to have all the ports work in this respect. > Not to mention this relatively large patch I have sitting here ready > for a 4-exp run after 4.10 is out the door as part of driving down the > (slow) road to something approaching autotools sanity. Ok. I'll steer clear then. You know about it now, so I'll leave you to it. Sorry for the breakdown in communication, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net