From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Mar 24 21:27:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.tcworks.net (ns.tcworks.net [216.61.218.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDFB37B891 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:27:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ccook@tcworks.net) Received: from tcworks.net (xcess@stuck.sticky.org [216.61.218.6]) by ns.tcworks.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA89029; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 23:24:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ccook@tcworks.net) Message-ID: <38DC4F18.D032FFCA@tcworks.net> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 23:31:04 -0600 From: Chris Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chriss Cc: Christian Schneider , FreeBSD ISP ML Subject: Re: SMP on Compaq ProLiant 1850R References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Chriss wrote: > > http://www.daemonnews.org/200003/cpqraid.html > Interesting reading, it says that FreeBSD uses the IDE device vectors with the Compaq RAID controller. I've noticed that FreeBSD's IDE support is quite sluggish in comparison to other *NIX's, I was wondering if fooling FreeBSD into thinking the SCSI drives are IDE dropped the SCSI drives performance to little better than IDE levels? Hope you could understand my question... -- Chris o----< ccook@tcworks.net >----------------------------------------o |Chris Cook - Technician | TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | |The Computer Works | FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | o-----------------------------------------------------------------o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message