Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Jan 1997 01:30:25 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de
Cc:        thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, ports@freebsd.org, chuckr@glue.umd.edu
Subject:   Re: cvs commit:  ports/x11/tix/patches etc.
Message-ID:  <199701060930.BAA18746@baloon.mimi.com>
In-Reply-To: <199701060728.IAA04795@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> (message from Thomas Gellekum on Mon, 6 Jan 1997 08:28:23 %2B0100 (MET))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * > Oh, come on. :)
 * 
 * This from the man who complained how much he hates Tk? 

Hey, I don't hate Tk (I even wrote a little application (misc/kp)
using it), I just hate the way every little change to the tcl/tk
builds seem to break one port or another....

 * > +	${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}/${dir}/*.h \
 *                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 * 
 * ${WRKSRC}?

No, ${WRKDIR}${DISTNAME} is correct.  ${WRKSRC} points elsewhere for
this port.

 * > +#	tk.h is already in ${PREFIX}/include
 * > +	${RM} ${PREFIX}/include/tk/generic/tk.h
 * 
 * If you want to save 30K there should be a link to generic/tk.h, but
 * some Tk extensions (like Tix) don't look in /usr/local/include for
 * their headers and would  miss tk.h.

Sorry, I can't parse this.  Are you saying I should make a link from
generic/tk.h to /usr/local/include/tk.h?

 * I have patches for tix in my homedir on freefall
 * (tix.diff). Unfortunately I don't have the time right now to test it.
 * Maybe later, if the connection isn't too bad.

Thanks.

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701060930.BAA18746>