From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 11:11:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C09737B401 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46DE43F93 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:11:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@tranquilwaters.us) Received: from adsl-64-164-82-156.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (HELO goliath.tranquilwaters.us) (khaybrak@sbcglobal.net@64.164.82.156 with login) by smtp-sbc-v1.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 18:11:57 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030606110949.02eab658@pop.sbcglobal.yahoo.com> X-Sender: khaybrak@sbcglobal.net@pop.sbcglobal.yahoo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 11:11:53 -0700 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org From: John Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: SCO Lawsuit X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:11:58 -0000 Any concerns to BSD / FreeBSD about SCO's suit against IBM / Linux? Any benefits? Just curious. I have never been a fan of SCO as it is and the article suggests the company may be benefiting from Microsoft's offer to pay license fees to SCO for UNIX code. End run by Microsoft?