From nobody Sat Apr 15 08:47:59 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Pz6Ql4B0Tz44vX1 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pz6Ql38DQz3LBh for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681548479; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s1nFsXiDM6pIANRBhIk5PCI08julBE5FG+BtFKrPW9A=; b=i60Ukkf+/6TLV5Kh+GM5bUhBYime4YkL6/Xqt4MXT6Sg0ynuaonN7HhXAvLJLXQFqloeRY Wxd7flY3GYs0E29Z0xsIABbRJd33vFWG8HfZNzfWRWseZRqHF/1PTygWIV4BrHg2dwRNNb V0EunhdZBkTYTd/IIpr0ZIzn00CKJ7eCJNLvnyTx/Iz4KiGD7Txlz6+MTeHkKKWsLEFFQ3 6tydBy4G3jZeyh+dOf54YsGtMHeiN3XhlDBh8cWGBGNqTC88VonTNTCgRoFCMikliPeCNo bvu5DTMEQY6ge2B9jLjNdjXEbRN+UHRPtz9PHj8JoSM1C2X598z7duTEMXWnrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1681548479; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QtSTdy/cbgibS3vAQeHpxc4fJTq+juQ40z21hnvkSWdlpr5nVmi52oXElLTw+6NwuguSPZ EPXAWZn500VDlWc4bsuz9guKk1rCRFu+WCB3P/U+cCFLV6CXJ9+jfNGfk3zfBt8D+vZ4lk uqO5oMtz4gTjpB/cs++qP6ci1tKSmEu+xdqcStC0lcz5guYAwHCZrnmRGxxH7bbHX6Dn28 0cysbzy8/G1pJzT5Ms25ItEHirRFQESCkh5+Qki6aQxAF46LdtllrR5XVugcKVRuJBh10S 4TdqYQz74y0VcMn+oL0xOWNaosyfbwvRdzHYrDVaVqwkCKB1zoYoRQ7edlOLOQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Pz6Ql28Ccz10Xy for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33F8lxrE088595 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33F8lxUc088594 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260260] igb(4) I35{0,4} parrent <--> vlan jumbo frame mtu mismatch Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:47:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260260 --- Comment #7 from Marek Zarychta --- No idea. Perhaps I am wrong. Now I recall that transitioned to stable/13 on affected machines relatively late, and the bug was reported here even later= . I wonder if lagg(4) has anything to do with it, since in the report of bug 268490, using lagg(4) has also been noted. I am utilising lagg on all affec= ted setups, think I can check if it's lagg dependent this weekend. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=