From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:18:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D4A16A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620E843D45 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1RFIs5U053136; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:18:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1RFIrY4093052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:18:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060227095704.085300c8@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:18:07 -0500 To: Danny Butroyd From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <44031194.8000300@g-mapps.com> References: <4402F009.1000407@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227093542.086c56c0@64.7.153.2> <44031194.8000300@g-mapps.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs woes in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:18:56 -0000 At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote: >I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the >version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe). > >Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current >version? Not really as there are many changes behind the scenes that impact it. Its not just the nfsd binary that has changed. There are a lot of kernel stuff in support of it that has changed. BTW, if you are using tcp mounts, and you have devices not on the same subnet, setting net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 helps with performance. However, this is a separate issue to the problems you are seeing. ---Mike >Danny