From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 24 01:02:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B037570 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from butcher-nb.yandex.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739010BD; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <553995A6.60603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:00:22 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sydney Meyer , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSec Performance under Xen References: <55397FB3.6080702@yandex.ru> <079851FA-50AC-47E8-B4BE-D97DE4C185B5@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <079851FA-50AC-47E8-B4BE-D97DE4C185B5@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:02:14 -0000 On 24.04.2015 03:55, Sydney Meyer wrote: > Andrey, > > with your patch applied the performance drop while using the > IPSEC-enabled kernel without doing actual IPSec traffic seems to be > gone. > > I haven't tested IPSec itself yet, as i had to start from scratch > with new VM's but i will set up a IPSec connection and report back. Thank you. But I think something will not work if you try it with IPSec. Probably if you use some IKE software, it will not work with this patch. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov