From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 30 21:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AFEA29 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B37D42 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2ULU102023505 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r2ULU10t023504; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201303302130.r2ULU10t023504@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Paul Beard Subject: Re: ports/177416: mail/postgrey has surfaced a bug in perl's taint checking X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Beard List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/177416; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul Beard To: Darren Pilgrim Cc: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: ports/177416: mail/postgrey has surfaced a bug in perl's taint checking Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:26:47 -0700 On Mar 30, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Darren Pilgrim = wrote: > Because you're going at it backwards.=20 It only looks that way. If I want to know what port requires this one, I = don't want to install other ports on a fishing expedition to find it. = Computers are really good at finding things, keeping lists, searching = and sorting. It seems like I should be able to search for ports that = require a specific one.=20 So what I am looking for is leaf ports (top-level ports makes more sense = but isn't used as an option). To me, that's backwards.=20 Anyway: portmaster -l returns this:=20 =3D=3D=3D>>> 293 leaf ports Hmm, that's a lot. After I winnow them down to the ones I actually use, = I could simply run make pretty-print-build-depends-list against each = one, sort the results to see what perl modules, if any surface, and test = postgrey against them.=20 It's too nice a day to faff about with this but I'll let you know if = anything turns up.=20 -- Paul Beard Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem?=20