From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 12 19:32:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45B31065673 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3407E8FC15 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 11496 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jun 2008 19:32:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 12 Jun 2008 19:32:26 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <485179C8.9090802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:32:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080606) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Makonnen References: <200806090907.m5997wwM043284@svn.freebsd.org> <86hcc2vjnv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <484E2E05.5080804@wubethiopia.com> In-Reply-To: <484E2E05.5080804@wubethiopia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= , src-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r179669 - head/sbin/rcorder X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:32:27 -0000 Mike Makonnen wrote: > [ cc'ing -rc ] > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Mike Makonnen writes: >>> Document the misleading nature of the REQUIRE line. The patch in >>> the PR has been heavily edited for style(9) and clarity. Mistakes are >>> mine. >> >> How about s/REQUIRE/AFTER/, to mirror BEFORE? > > I would be in favor of that. Any objections? In some ways I think this would be a good change, although I confess I have a yellow warning light in the "possibly gratuitous change" column. My preference would be that we ask the netbsd guys about this before we do it, either so that they can consider doing it also, or to warn us about why it would be a bad idea. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection