From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 17:09:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A9A16A41F; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3004643D62; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CBA1A3C29; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8721C52941; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:09:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20051025170934.GA29561@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051023105230.GA55181@frontfree.net> <20051023232935.GC602@dragon.NUXI.org> <20051024080811.GF39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20051025004757.GH14063@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051025004757.GH14063@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Peter Jeremy , delphij@delphij.net, developers@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it feasible to cross-build compat5x binary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:09:43 -0000 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:47:57AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Peter and others, >=20 > > At some stage, we need to validate our cross-build chain with cmp(1). > > We can probably leverage off the work that NetBSD has done in this > > area. This would significantly simplify the work involved in supporting > > the various architectures. >=20 > in case you know enough about NetBSD's build.sh, can you say if FreeBSD's > build architecture is powerful enough to merely use it with a few s/// > or does it still lack one or more things ? I expect it's pretty different. ru@ did a lot of work on cross-building FreeBSD though, and he had a fairly detailed list of known differences between cross-built and native builds. I'm not sure if he reduced it to 0 length. Kris --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDXmbOWry0BWjoQKURAi4oAJ0XkYOWewesxcz0rziVaYWa8r0RBQCfQDOB /+WAtJO3n32fgmdwWPwnDnE= =1CWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--