Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:47:27 +0200 From: Frank Wall <fw@moov.de> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/146146: [patch] net-mgmt/p5-Cflow: add OPTIONS support Message-ID: <20100507094727.GA78045@luzy.moov.de> In-Reply-To: <201004290900.o3T90C0Q055419@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201004290856.o3T8uCgh029320@www.freebsd.org> <201004290900.o3T90C0Q055419@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > >Synopsis: [patch] net-mgmt/p5-Cflow: add OPTIONS support > >Arrival-Date: Thu Apr 29 09:00:12 UTC 2010 Well, my patch is wrong. Attached is a new working patch. Besides that the new patch passes the maintainership to me (was: ports@FreeBSD.org). --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch_cflow.txt" --- net-mgmt/p5-Cflow/Makefile.orig 2010-05-07 10:14:19.000000000 +0200 +++ net-mgmt/p5-Cflow/Makefile 2010-05-07 10:39:55.000000000 +0200 @@ -13,12 +13,16 @@ http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/Cflow/old/ PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- -MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org +MAINTAINER= fw@moov.de COMMENT= Analyze raw flow files written by cflowd (Cisco NetFlow data) +OPTIONS= FLOW_TOOLS "Enable flow-tools support" off + +.include <bsd.port.pre.mk> + .if defined(WITH_FLOW_TOOLS) -BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libft.a:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/flow-tools RUN_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libft.a:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/flow-tools +BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libft.a:${PORTSDIR}/net-mgmt/flow-tools CFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include -DOSU CONFIGURE_ARGS+= \ @@ -30,4 +34,4 @@ MAN1= flowdumper.1 MAN3= Cflow.3 -.include <bsd.port.mk> +.include <bsd.port.post.mk> --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100507094727.GA78045>