From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 12 06:36:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2930106566C for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604508FC16 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so2260849ywf.13 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:36:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f0c432LlABAZcnmjcMdtVMW6ab3DGYXLstua7yn4Tr4=; b=ReKgM+/n8Z2WQiLdERLelqeYrMAwy6cz9LVYPmKEIMB93jszX4dD7Q/RdunX6uSzWV nC01SuRHvQMYRDD43cLVNAfW4VToMr4sXr8jV8O7zWnvN9GqgnRgCZRPGDdofAvR0RwQ 9FTbbWhftqWntODOdv5lnYJOMEi35NbA73CZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hFecKTYVQ+wkABtpzzbKSWsBNi3fuFJ7wbTZmAYpperb6aiu3nZqCR8IhtE9Tgpor7 bjmC/ul6OerTjC+vIAFIebn9vVRAW65YMXg1DK1I5BdGFG9DdcI8aTkvtkU5roIrtFUj eEgEqc+QY11lXHwEHTl/rcBsuHuF9nlh20I0Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.25.11 with SMTP id c11mr4698580ybj.445.1307860599804; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.216.3 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:36:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:36:39 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wBMx_I08aoCKaC_m-LxSzT1B_Ho Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [RFC] shipping kernels with default modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:36:40 -0000 On 11 June 2011 17:21, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Is there any reason we aren't doing this at the moment? Eg by having a > default loader modules list populated from the kernel config file? The immediate problem - how does one get the config parameters from the kernel configuration file to appear in the per-module build setup? Or, in a more general sense, how do you do per-module configuration? Adrian