From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Tue Oct 16 16:17:37 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCBB10D92F7
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647EF73E45
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@opsec.eu>)
 id 1gCS2L-000ErA-SM; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:17:37 +0200
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:17:37 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>
To: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@nethead.se>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL version in -STABLE?
Message-ID: <20181016161737.GA28382@home.opsec.eu>
References: <765c6051-1621-02cc-7abc-dd046bc50d57@nethead.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <765c6051-1621-02cc-7abc-dd046bc50d57@nethead.se>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:17:38 -0000

Hi!

> As I understand it, there are plans for a major upgrade of OpenSSL in
> -CURRENT.

Yes.

> Will this likely be backported to 11-STABLE

As far as I understand: most probably not, it would break
too much on 11-STABLE (it's a mess on 12, too 8-})

> or should I prepare
> switching to 12 when it is ready? Would prefer not to be dependant on
> the security/openssl port.

Well, both have the same upstream, so in the end, both will
probably need/receive updates...

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    2 years to go !