From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 23 23:51:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9757137B401 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:51:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from splode.eterna.com.au (splode.eterna.com.au [203.15.111.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12B843F18 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 23:51:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mrg@eterna.com.au) Received: from splode.eterna.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by splode.eterna.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFBD92A0; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +1100 (EST) To: Kris Kennaway Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Pavel Cahyna subject: re: glibc vs BSD libc in-reply-to: your message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:52:03 -0800." <20030123195203.GG60077@rot13.obsecurity.org> organisation: people's front against (bozotic) www (softwar foundation) x-other-organisation: The NetBSD Foundation. Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +1100 Message-ID: <26445.1043394695@splode.eterna.com.au> From: matthew green Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG They presumably did it because they thought it would be a good idea. Perhaps they wanted to hide implementation differences between different OSes. Either way, the low-level functions in FreeBSD work just fine. FWIW, i just ran "man funopen" on my netbsd box and it says: HISTORY The funopen() functions first appeared in 4.4BSD. BUGS The funopen() function may not be portable to systems other than BSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message