Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:55:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210168] math/gsl: Update to 2.2.1 Message-ID: <bug-210168-13-wrMQRl4S4l@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210168-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210168-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210168 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |adamw@FreeBSD.org |org | Status|New |Open Summary|[patch] math/gsl: update to |math/gsl: Update to 2.2.1 |2.2.1 | --- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Reporter is committer, assign accordingly. I see 46 dependents, is an exp-run worthwhile so that potential fallout can= be seen (at least at build time), prior to updating the main port to 2.x? + 1 on a gsl1 port (if gsl is to move across the major version barrier), OR= a new gsl2 port for 2.x versions. I would add that in addition to this, a sweeping change pointing all depend= ents to the 1.x port is better than switching them implicitly/automatically to 2= .x. This allows those port maintainers to switch to the 2.x port at their leisu= re (and having QA'd it them individually). I did this with the www/py-requests 1.x -> 2.x transition which worked well. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210168-13-wrMQRl4S4l>