From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 17:44:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1CF16A414 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkirhlarov@localhost.oilspace.com) Received: from office.oilspace.com (office.oilspace.com [194.129.65.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE1C43D7C for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 17:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkirhlarov@localhost.oilspace.com) Received: from dimma.mow.oilspace.com (hq.oilspace.com [81.222.156.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by office.oilspace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64108136CA4 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 18:44:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from dimma.mow.oilspace.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dimma.mow.oilspace.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k42HiT1B005346 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 21:44:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dkirhlarov@localhost.oilspace.com) Received: (from dkirhlarov@localhost) by dimma.mow.oilspace.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k42HiTkm005345 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 May 2006 21:44:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dkirhlarov) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 21:44:29 +0400 From: Dmitriy Kirhlarov To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mutt-ng devel (2005-03-13) based on Mutt 1.5.9 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Cc: Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 17:44:49 -0000 Hi! On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I think it's same problem as in thread "fsck_ufs locked in snaplk". > > Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? > > I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed > before the release. Sorry, the bug reports came too late in the > release cycle. Imho, it's bad idea -- create release with so important bug. It's not coda, unionfs or something else. It's very useful. I think, postpone release for fix this issue -- more fine. By. Dmitriy