From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 22 16:23:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA13215 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:23:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13195 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:22:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA24813; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:11:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd024808; Mon Dec 22 16:10:57 1997 Message-ID: <349F00E7.167EB0E7@whistle.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 16:08:07 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: Luoqi Chen , dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: msdosfs win95 long file name support References: <4430.882828495@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Is there a possibility that you guys can make a version of teh netbsd > > code that is clean enough to be acceptable to dima and friends? > > > > :) > > That's only one of the possible options and I wouldn't want it to > preclude consideration of the 2nd, which is to add FAT32 support to > what Luoqi has already done. It's less important to get something in > immediately than it is to get something in which will be *supported* > for awhile and, if our past track record is anything to go by, we've > not been much good at tracking any of NetBSD's more significant > subsystem changes. If someone's more enthusiastic about a home-grown > solution then I'd be more inclined to bank on enthusiasm than on any > particular source. > > Jordan very true.. it would be best if we had a unified version with 2 people who understand it than 2 different versions.