From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 08:10:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F8516A4B3 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA1A43FDD for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:10:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Stocker@t-online.de) Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1A6X0F-0000KV-01; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:10:27 +0200 Received: from [10.1.2.252] (E64Ia4ZOQeuBUpizuAmMK0ZEV04QEsEhL7vbdeN8PFU5F5nVm4zCkC@[217.225.127.108]) by fwd08.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1A6Wzy-1T9R8y0; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:10:10 +0200 From: Jan.Stocker@t-online.de (Jan Stocker) To: Thomas Quinot In-Reply-To: <20031005225809.GC7829@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <200310050753.h957rLOa029055@spider.deepcore.dk> <1065345478.611.12.camel@Twoflower.liebende.de> <20031005225809.GC7829@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1065453008.606.5.camel@Twoflower.liebende.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:10:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: E64Ia4ZOQeuBUpizuAmMK0ZEV04QEsEhL7vbdeN8PFU5F5nVm4zCkC cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CDROM / UDMA problem on -current (2 hours old) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jan.Stocker@t-online.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:10:31 -0000 > are printed so fast i cant really read .... but it must be something > > like that: > > acd1: WARNING - REQUEST_UDMA .... (error request) > > acd1: WARNING - INQUIRE_SENSE .... (retrying request) > > Little can be said without complete and accurate error messages, > preferrably including a complete kernel backtrace, but still it would be I would give you more info... but as i wrote... thats an endless loop. > interesting to know whether the enclosed patch changes anything to your > situation. Will try it. Pls give me some mins (~30) > > /usr/local/bin/cdrecord: Permission denied. Cannot send SCSI cmd via ioctl > > Check perms on your /dev nodes. cdrecord runs suid root .... should be enough rights... > it's an atapicam problem... > > That we do not know so far. Recent problems reported by ATAPI/CAM users > were mostly ATA and CAM bugs. Please do not make such hasty statements > until a complete analysis of the problem has been made. Okay... you're right... shame on me and i try to see more in the depth of the kernel in the future