From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 30 05:12:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD7116A41F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07D2F43D45 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 86963 invoked by uid 0); 30 Mar 2006 05:12:27 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2006 05:12:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2U53hnP005753; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:03:43 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <442B66AF.30803@alphaque.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:03:43 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20060213 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <44295972000015BC@cpms02.int.iprimus.net.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: johnryan_852@iprimus.com.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Soekris Net4801 performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:12:31 -0000 On 03/30/06 09:28 Mike Tancsa said the following: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:19:25 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions > you wrote: >>ftp put is around 3Mbytes/sec and ftp get is around 2Mbytes/sec >>ifconfig says: > They are not the fastest around, but it depends what you want to do > with them. On an older 4501, I get about 7Mb. You should be able to > get that at least. m0n0wall, a freebsd based router/firewall project is built for both the soekris net45xx and net48xx boxes. m0n0wall 1.2 is based on freebsd 4.x and m0n0wall 1.3 (which i'm currently maintaining) is based on freebsd 6.x. we've seen clear degradation of network throughput between m0n0 1.2 and 1.3. we usually use iperf for throughput testing with the m0n0wall sitting in between. search the m0n0wall lists for past throughput comparisons. [1] http://m0n0.ch/wall/ -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+