From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Sep 14  0:42: 5 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0A2155BB
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA20991;
	Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Building new kernel fails?
References: <Mike Tancsa's message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 10:02:17 -0400">  <3.0.5.32.19990913100217.01bbb3e0@staff.sentex.ca> <3.0.5.32.19990913125655.018c2e90@staff.sentex.ca>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 14 Sep 1999 09:41:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: Mike Tancsa's message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:56:55 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzplnaaym62.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
> I think it did in this case (at least he indicated in a followup email). It
> seems to have been old cruft in his compile directory. As for the changes
> in /etc, this will eventually cause problems no ? e.g. /etc/mtree changes

The mtree specs in /etc/mtree aren't used by any part of the system,
and it's *still* not relevant to his problem.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message