From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 27 07:13:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B3337B401; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust38.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4970043FBF; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:13:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.12) id 199mtx-000IYQ-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:13:09 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:13:09 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Mark Murray Message-ID: <20030427141309.GA71304@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Mark Murray , Scott Long , Doug Barton , FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <3EABD516.2090100@btc.adaptec.com> <200304271404.h3RE4TPm084271@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304271404.h3RE4TPm084271@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: Scott Long cc: Doug Barton cc: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-rc] Re: RFC: Removal of the old rc system from -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:13:13 -0000 On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > Scott Long writes: > > My premise is this: there are people who cvsup and build world on a > > regular basis, track current@, etc, and there are those who are only > > interested in running official releases. My concern is not the first > > group, but the second group. The old rc system has been around for > > quite some time, and it might be a shock if it disappears without > > warning. > > This would be a plus IMO. I'm aware of at least one FreeBSDer who > installed from CD and wondered why his changes to rc.* (not rc.d.*) > didn't work at all. Removing those files simplifies things. Yes. Those users are unlikely to know to specify rc_ng="NO" , so rc.* won't work for them anyway. Ceri --