From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 18 13:51:33 1994 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA10385 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 18 Dec 1994 13:51:33 -0800 Received: from mailhost.tue.nl (mailhost.tue.nl [131.155.2.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA10364 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 1994 13:50:42 -0800 Received: from asterix.urc.tue.nl (asterix.urc.tue.nl [131.155.5.10]) by mailhost.tue.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA16844 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 1994 22:49:53 +0100 Received: (from wmbfmk@localhost) by asterix.urc.tue.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9) id VAA12787 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Dec 1994 21:49:52 GMT From: Marc van Kempen Message-Id: <199412182149.VAA12787@asterix.urc.tue.nl> Subject: Problems with 2.0 and 3c579 To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Dec 1994 22:49:52 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 577 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 2.0 on a Pentium with a 3c579 network card for a local company here. The card is recognized allright when I change the port from 0x300 to 0x1000. However, after doing an ifconfig as follows: ifconfig ep0 100.100.100.20 netmask 0xff000000 (It's a local network) I can't do anything with the network. Ping, telnet, mount and nfs don't do anything, however 'ifconfig ep0' reports the interface is up. Are there any known problems with the 3c579 and fbsd 2.0, or am I doing something wrong networkwise? Regards, Marc van Kempen.