Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:09:44 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil+cvs-ports@tandon.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys Makefile Message-ID: <20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 06:00:53 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:56:30PM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: > > eadler 2012-02-18 23:56:30 UTC > > > > Modified files: > > devel/adime Makefile > > x11-wm/icewm Makefile > > graphics/scr2png Makefile > > x11/xbindkeys Makefile > > Log: > > Remove gratitutous version number from LIB_DEPENDS where not required. > > How can it be verified if it's required or not? Even if you can prove it's > not now, what about the next releases? Instead of having to constantly keep > track and check if shlib version is "required", I would suggest simply > making it standard practice and always specify it. It also helps to find > ports that were forgotten to get updateD after shlib bumps in dependency. Alexey, I appreciate your perspective on this, but I want to make sure you are aware of the related discussion (and opposing viewpoints) on freebsd-ports: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073267.html -- Sahil Tandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120219150943.GA6673>